Jesus in a Cracker!!

How to even begin to describe such silliness?

Oh noes!  Members of the St. Elizabeth Ann Seton church are heartbroken!  Tears in their eyes!  They found Jesus stuffed in hymnals in the pews!!

I’m sorry, but heartbroken and with tears in their eyes?  It’s bread, you idiots, bread.  Just because some pedophile said magic words over it doesn’t change it from being bread.  It’s not the body of some two-thousand-year-old Jewish zombie, it’s BREAD.  Seek mental help.  From someone who doesn’t believe in hokum.

Is the church doing enough to emphasize the sacredness of the host?  No sir-ee, it’s doing too much.  These people don’t need another reason to feel sad and heartbroken in this world, and a mass-murdering bunch of child rapists are doing enough evil in the world without giving some old women complexes over a pack of stale crackers.

Never mind the disgusting factor of people thinking that it’s okay to participate in ritual cannibalism.

What these folks need to be heartbroken over is that their money goes into the pockets of an organization that is responsible for the deaths of millions of people every single year, because of its dogmatic taboo about condom use, and its representatives lying to people about condom’s effectiveness in preventing HIV.  Because every dollar dropped in those plates makes that individual dropping it personally responsible for the actions of the church.

But the crackers?  Perspective, people.  Get some fresh, because the current variety ain’t working.

 

Posted in Crazy, Evil, Religion | Leave a comment

The Cowardice of the Religious

I’ve just read a breakdown of Michigan’s utter failure to pass anti-bullying legislation – in which Christian Republicans turned the law around and made it a blanket protection for bullies who commit their actions because of a “…strong moral or religious…” reason for committing it.

This isn’t unique to Michigan, of course – objections to hate-crime and anti-bullying legislation always meets opposition by Christians.  Have you noticed that?  That Christians seem to cherish as a core tenet of their religion, the option to insult and attack people whom they feel aren’t up to snuff?

Allow me to point something out to the Christians in the audience:  your freedom of religion ends where it becomes assault, or battery.  The rest of us passing a law telling you that you aren’t allowed to beat up people isn’t an infringement on your freedom of religion.  If that were the case, I’d immediately start a religion in which I made it a core tenet that all Christians would be required to be shot repeatedly in the head with a high-caliber rifle.  How about that for religious freedom?  Murder laws?  Oh, they oppress my religious beliefs.  (/snark).

See the analogy here, folks?  Beating up some kid because she doesn’t believe in your fantasyland magic sky fairy isn’t a right you possess.  Killing some gay kid because she’s gay isn’t a right you possess.  It isn’t a right that anyone possesses, but we do have a term for it:

Religious terrorism.

Hate-crime and bullying laws are introduced because there is something peculiar about those offenses.  They are generally committed by people who seem to think it’s perfectly okay to commit them, and they have a group of people who support them.  The laws are designed to punish violators specifically and differently in order to not only exact appropriate punishment for the crime, but to educate the support system behind them that it isn’t okay to do these things.

But what is amazingly shameful is the – in this case, successful – attempt by Christians to enshrine their hatred of others and protect the kids who act it out.  And there’s a term for that, too:

Loathesome.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Okay, I’ve had just about enough of the retards.

Mississippi seems crammed full of them, and mostly in the Republican legislature.  Surprise, surprise.  Allow me to introduce you to “Initiative Measure 26”, which, in short, proposes to classify any fertilized egg (whether cloned, in-vitro’d, or just plain sexed up) as a “person.”  i.e., as a full human.

Sorry, folks, but that’s simply, undeniably, NOT TRUE.  It’s a purely specious fiction driven by someone who wants to put public face to their fake piety.  A single cell does not represent a person.  By that definition of “humanity”, each and every one of us flushes away more humanity than most abortions every time we take a dump.  Think that over.  Furthermore, no person, regardless of age, race, nationality, sexual orientation or faith position has any right to claim any part of another person – and what this law is paving the way for is that such a claim can be made.  Specifically, “this person needs your body in order to survive.”  If you agree to that logic, then sign yourself up for a kidney donation right now – because there’s someone who needs it, and you can supply it to save their life.

Litmus test:  you’re in a burning building, and you see in the room a terrified little girl crying for her mommy, and a cooler with five frozen embryos on ice.  You can save one, the other will burn.  Choose.

Once and for all:  get your dumb-fuck religion out of the courthouse, you fraudulent retards.  I’ve gone on at length about how absolutely moronic you have to be to believe in that stupid shit – and the sad part is watching otherwise-smart people compartmentalize so they can “believe in it” – but that shit has absolutely no place in determining public policy.  Or polite society, for that matter.

My CAT can make better decisions than someone trying to come up with something out of the bible.  Speaking of which, anti-abortion language is not to be found in the bible.  There’s only one law regarding aborted pregnancy in there, and it only specifies that if you hit a woman, and she is with child, and she miscarries, then you have to pay compensation to her husband.  Mull that one over for a minute.  It’s a construct of the misogynistic attitudes of conservative Christians to rile up their political base.   Damn, do you people ever fucking read that stupid book?

Let me point out something:  if you honestly, genuinely give a shit about the lives of babies, then do something about the infant mortality rate.  Blow all that advertising money and lobbying money (hint, hint, do you see a little reason right there why this issue continues to get its horn blown?)  on helping poor people feed their babies, on medicine for them, or better still, on getting them free access to birth control so they won’t have to have babies in the first place.

The answer is this:  break the cycle.  Don’t make it worse.

UPDATE:  as of 9 November, the voters of Mississippi turn out to be considerably smarter than their moron legislators.  It would seem that when voters, even Republican voters, are shown their Republican legislators’ true agenda, they reject it.  Which of course spawns the question – why in the world would anyone continue to associate with the ass-clown Republican party when they can simply drop it?

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Sorry to be all doom-and-gloom…

…but I follow the study of microbes and viruses as an interest I’ve had for years.  They’re cool.  They’re the smallest things in the world you can still call “alive” and they often times make their living by hunting us.  That’s a bit dramatic, they don’t really “hunt” us, but they do successfully eat us.  Regardless of the figures you have in your bank account, regardless of your political or religious leanings, regardless of skin color, sexual orientation, whatever.  They eat us.  (Okay, there are some resistances that are carried by different varieties of people, for instance people of African descent have a slightly higher resistance to malaria – a parasitic infection – due to their blood structure, which coincidentally also makes them more susceptible to sickle cell anemia).

This blog post on SciAm today reminded me of this, and inspired me to do a little writing on the subject.

Bacteria and viruses, when they cause disease, generally do so because they – or we – have not yet evolved to properly coexist in a developed relationship.  Such relationships exist throughout nature…for example, you have thousands of different bacteria in and on you right now, and you are a carrier of them.  Escheria coli, for instance, or a range of Staph bacteria live in your gut and on your skin, respectively.  When our species – or our ancestor lines, since these have been with us very likely since before we were humans – first encountered these, it was likely a violent meeting.  The ebola virus is a not-so-subtle reminder that when two species have their first meeting, it is often explosive.  Ebola doesn’t know what to do with us, and we don’t know what to do with Ebola, so when it eats it just keeps going, and we have no natural method of stopping it – and it eats until there is no more left to eat.

And really, what occurs when a microbe and a human-size creature come to live with one another is that the large creature finds a way to survive, shunt off the worst effects, and sometimes even benefit from the presence of the microbe.  The microbe, being unthinking, just goes on about its business of living, eating, reproducing, and dying.

Lately, though, we have inadvertently re-ignited some fights with existing microbes.  Some of you may know of MRSA, a “multiply-resistant” form of Staphylococcus Aureus, a bacteria commonly found on your skin.  This bacteria is available in many forms, one of which is the infamous “flesh eating” bacteria.  There are also several strains of E. coli that are dangerous – even lethal.  And some of these are resistant as well.

For those unfamiliar with the term “resistant”, that implies resistance to our antibiotics.  Antibiotics are the weapons we use in our ongoing war with microbes.  They’re the bullets your doctor uses to shoot the bad guys when the bad guys attack you.  For instance, when you get pneumonia, chances are your doctor will prescribe something like streptomycin (btw – “mycin” indicates the antibiotic is a derivative of a fungus, which is where most of our antibiotics come from; fungus have been fighting bacteria for a long freaking time, and have developed a hefty arsenal).  Bacteria get killed by these chemicals in large quantities.  However, the bullets aren’t perfect, and sometimes the bacteria have the microbial version of body armor.  Some bacteria will inevitably survive exposure to the antibiotics.

But here’s where the real kicker shows up – the ones that survive are the tough ones.  And since the weak ones are dead and get swept away, that leaves a lot of room for the tough ones to breed.  So you hit them again before they get the chance to do that.  This is why it is really important for you to finish any course of antibiotics that your doctor gives you.  You can’t just take pills until the sick symptoms go away – if you stop, you’re leaving behind the tough bacteria.  You finish the course to further weaken the remaining bacteria, kill what you can.  Your body also works against them, and if they’re weakened by antibiotics, your body has a much easier time defeating them.  So chances are, you’ll eliminate the infection completely.  But if you stop halfway, you might stop being sick, but you’ll leave a population of toughened bacteria behind.

This is one of the reasons I tell everyone I know to never use “antibacterial” soaps and cleaners.  The reason?  When you wipe down a counter with an antibacterial, then you kill probably 99.9% of the bacteria on the surface.  That 0.1% remainder can re-populate the surface in 24 hours.  And what’s more, the entire population will be descendants of the bacteria with the highest resistance to that antibacterial agent.  Repeated cleanings with the same material repeat this cycle.  At the end of the bottle, you’ve created a false sense of confidence for yourself, and a practically immune population of bacteria for your countertop.

What’s more, bacteria share genes among themselves.  Even different species of bacteria do this.  When they bump into each other, they have a tendency to form little tubules that connect their cells, and genes are passed between them on little chunks of DNA called plasmids.  Think of it as something like an early version of sex mixed with a game of telephone with cans and strings.  Different species have been observed to trade genes for antibiotic resistance among themselves.

Now, let’s change the subject to livestock.  Chickens, pigs, cows, etc.  Farmers discovered long ago that giving livestock antibiotics in small doses as part of their regular feed makes for larger, healthier animals – in other words, that treatment translates into real dollars and cents when the time comes to sell the meat and other products derived from the livestock.  This has been going on for decades.  Something like 29 million pounds of antibiotics are consumed by America’s livestock annually.

These animals are given a steady stream of diluted antibiotics.  These animals live in extremely close proximity to one another.  Each one of them is, to put it mildly hardly a sterile environment.  Cases of resistant Staph, E. coli, and even Salmonella have been documented numerous times at a host of different farms.  A friend of mine, who might be reading this right now, twenty years ago became something of an expert at the disposal methods for pig shit (the term used then was “Swine Waste Management”), and can attest to the enormous lagoons of liquefied feces that comprise the waste dumps for pig farms.  Chicken poop and cow poop meet different fates, but the animals in question are generally exposed – and exposed liberally – to the output of one another’s GI tract on a daily, if not hourly, basis.

And those wastes contain large quantities of resistant strains of bacteria.

So – when you hear about a spill in North Carolina where a lagoon of pig waste broke its levee and spilled an absolutely obscene quantity of pig crap into a local river, you’re looking at an accident that doesn’t just have disgusting implications.  You’re looking at a severely dangerous biohazard.  One that has enormous health consequences.

But those spills don’t occur often, and are easy enough to avoid, right?

Allow me to present to you the common housefly.  The housefly, whose wriggling children grow in those very lagoons, waste pits, and cisterns of resistant bacteria, maturing into winged adults in a shockingly fast period.  Who eat, walk in, and vomit that slurry of unmentionables – often on the food you are about to eat, yourself.

And in whose gut can be found these resistant bacteria.

The housefly can cover five miles in a day, easily.  And it can hitch a ride in a vehicle just as easily as a human can.  The housefly buzzing around you may very easily have come from a very distant location.

A resistant strain of bacteria does not have to cause illness immediately.  A person may be colonized by a strain for years before any infection occurs – remember, Staphylococcus lives naturally on human skin.  A person is likely to never even know they are carrying these bacteria.  Until they get scratched, or cut, or have an accident, or even go in to the doctor for surgery.  Then, when the skin is open, the bacteria get in – and the weapons we’ve spent battling the bugs for decades will turn out to be useless.

What’s the point of all this, you ask?  Kill more houseflies?  Yes, kill them if you can and will.

More importantly – be aware of what we created.  We.  In our desire for more and cheaper foodstuffs, we are incurring a heavy, heavy price, one that will very likely be paid by our kids in a far more dangerous environment.

We can stop this, but we have to be willing to pay a little more for our food.  Outlawing the use of antibiotics on animals that are not sick would be a great start.  Breaking up the big industrial-farming operations in favor of smaller, free-range farms would be another good step.  Cooking the food you buy thoroughly is probably the most proactive measure you can take.  Most of all though, is simple awareness:  awareness of the food you are about to put in your mouth, awareness of the industry that produces it, and awareness of the habits of microbes.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Wow. Republicans and Foreign Policy.

What a bunch of cartoon characters.  Seriously.

To sit around and listen to Michelle Bachmann bloviate about how nations we have “liberated” should compensate us must have drained every Republican on the planet of any extra neurons they had left.  I mean, holy fucking Christ on a hooker, is there anyone who is really that fucking dumb in Congress?

I would expect that level of ignorance from a high school drop-out in Branson, Missouri.  But this is supposed to be one of the best people Minnesota can offer us.  Hey, Minnesota?  I know you can do better.  Get rid of the brain-sucking alien and elect a real person, please.

Allow me to point out a little factoid here.  Let’s use Iraq and Afghanistan as examples, since they’re obviously what she’s alluding to.

In both cases, we “liberated” them from regimes that we, ourselves, installed and backed.  WE put Saddam Hussein in the cat-bird’s seat by funding and supplying him with weapons in order to fight the decade-long Iran-Iraq war.  WE funded Al Qaeda and the Taliban at their inception against the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.  That was US.  That we later had a falling out and bombed the fuck out of both of them was simply the inevitable conclusion to a long and painful lesson in nation-building.  To claim that the citizenry of those countries somehow “owes us” for getting rid of the regimes in question is a lot like your plumber coming over to your house uninvited, reversing the flow on your toilets, then coming back a month later after your house is full of liquid shit, turning the flow off, and handing you a bill for the service.

And even if we hadn’t forced those regimes on them, to present the idea that we should demand in some piratical fashion that all this grandstanding about bringing freedom to them “don’t come for free” is so amorally mercenary as to leave one speechless.  Furthermore, it is a fantasy bordering on certifiably insane to think that we could bomb the living fuck out of everyone in either country – including hundreds of thousands of civilians (and in the case of Iraq, the entire city of Fallujah, using banned white-phosphorous rounds, a war crime on top of a war crime) – and then to turn around and expect them to be grateful to us for it?

Someone send these dumbass candidates off to the Soylent Green factory.  It’s quite obvious that they are incapable of any level of foreign policy beyond “Pull My Finger.”

I’ll give one kudo out here, though – and surprisingly, it’s to Ron Paul.  At least he was able to remind everyone that Ronald Reagan was a back-door negotiator with terrorists (and a treasonous one at that – as he began negotiations on his own, prior to his election to Federal office, in order to degrade his opponent’s standing with the American people prior to the election).  He also pointed out that not one of the people currently held in Guantanimo Bay has ever been convicted of a crime.

And some of those people have been there for over ten years.  Anyone who was snapped up in there as a late-teens kid on the streets of Khabul is now a late-20s prisoner.  A DECADE of their lives have been spent there, against our Constitutional law, against the will of our people, and with your endorsement.

That’s your legacy, Republicans.  How anyone can call themselves a moral person and still consider themselves a Republican is quite literally beyond my capacity to understand.  It displays a severe case of cognitive dissonance, worthy of a textbook study.  These amoral, evil fools are the best among them.

Stew on that.

 

Posted in Corruption, Crazy, Evil, Politics, Teabaggers | Leave a comment

I’m sooooo glad I didn’t see this…

…back when Predator 2 first came out.  As a film, it was a lot of fun and a nice add-on to the Predator franchise.  But this might have pulled something away from it.  As it is, today, I can laugh and keep laughing…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

So, in the 21st Century, when technology and science are here to stay…

…the Republican Party considers Rick Perry to be one of their top minds to run the country?

Here’s what the Republican Party is about, folks – like it or not, they are anti-science.  As anti as they come.  As an example, Rick Perry’s climate denial not only is a personally held belief (batshit crazy as it may be), it is the official policy of the Texas state government under his leadership to alter and falsify scientific findings that conflict with the climate denial theme.

Don’t believe it?  Take it from the mouths of the scientists themselves – all 200+ of them – who just withdrew their names from a landmark climate study because Perry’s appointees scrubbed it of factual data and accurate conclusions that conflicted with their anti-climate-change ideology.  

In an age where science and information is king, lying about science should be a capital offense.  And the Republicans are supreme liars when it comes to science.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Back From Paradise

…and even though the weather’s crappy, Prague is a good place to be ).

Meanwhile, I’m hitched now – Misa and I tied the knot while we were in Hawaii.  Feels weird, but in a good way.  We had a wonderful time, and a great vacation surrounded the whole thing.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Heading out…

…on holiday, to return to live status on October 3rd!  I’ll be heading to Hawaii, and hope to post lots of good pics afterwards!  Meanwhile, enjoy your time and I’ll see you when I return!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Coming up…

24 Hours of Reality – which should help anyone who still has “doubts” about climate change.

Unless of course, that might shatter someone’s preciously-held fantasy that it isn’t happening…

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment